Idiosophy

A physicist loose among the liberal arts

Author: Joe Page 11 of 31

Site manager

Ominous Furlongs

“Furlong” is fun to say, and Professor Tolkien liked to say “furlong” as much as anyone else. He got it into LotR 14 times, one of which occurs as the Fellowship (and the Prancing Pony Podcast) approaches the artificial lake in front of Moria.

I don’t know if this is common, but the use of “furlong” that stuck in my mind as a child was this one:

Almost forgetting for the moment all thoughts of Moby Dick, we now gazed at the most wondrous phenomenon which the secret seas have hitherto revealed to mankind. A vast pulpy mass, furlongs in length and breadth, of a glancing cream-colour, lay floating on the water, innumerable long arms radiating from its centre, and curling and twisting like a nest of anacondas, as if blindly to clutch at any hapless object within reach. No perceptible face or front did it have; no conceivable token of either sensation or instinct; but undulated there on the billows, an unearthly, formless, chance-like apparition of life.

-Herman Melville, Moby-Dick, ch.59

Given what’s under the water of that lake, I wonder if Professor Tolkien stuck “furlongs” there on purpose.

Can’t Hear the Forest for the Trees

I have been reading things I thought were selected without pattern from across my range of dilettantish interests.  But not so — they’ve turned out to be a lot more connected than I was expecting.

Item: A permaculturist has suggested that I plant a chestnut orchard at the farm.  The soil isn’t ideal for that, so I’ve been doing a lot of reading to find out how possible that can be. Penn State knows a lot about disease-resistant hybrids. The American Chestnut Foundation has an interesting program to back-cross resistant hybrids with native chestnuts to try and restore something like the original tree to its original range. Chestnuts sound interesting, and tasty.

Item: From reading various tweets about Native American politics, I came to hear about a book by Robin Wall Kimmerer called Braiding Sweetgrass. Dr. Kimmerer is a botanist who wrote about the interface between Native lore and our emerging understanding of ecological dynamics. A great deal of it is about forests.  There’s a chapter entitled “Learning the Grammar of Animacy”, in which she talks about learning the language of a place, by listening. (Some form of the word “listen” occurs 78 times in 350 e-book pages.) Her thesis is that tens of thousands of years 0f coevolution gave Natives the language they need to understand their ecosystem, and “language” is used literally.

“The very best scientists are humble enough to listen.”

“The language scientists speak, however precise,is based on a profound error in grammar, an omission, a grave loss in translation from the native languages of these shores.”

“I come here to listen, to nestle in the curve of the roots in a soft hollow of pine needles…”

Item: The Overstory by Richard Powers has been sitting on my bookshelf for a year. It begins and ends with a chestnut tree. (no spoiler) It has oblique references to J.R.R. Tolkien in several places, as much of the environmentalist movement does. This is a brilliant novel, and reading it immediately after Braiding Sweetgrass was a shock of familiarity. Kimmerer’s ideas underlie Powers’s novel like a hyporheic flow.  Towards the end, this line jumped out:

His hand goes out, gesturing toward the conifers. “It amazes me how much they say, when you let them. They’re not that hard to hear.”  The man chuckles. “We’ve been trying to tell you that since 1492.” (p.493)

Item: Megan Fontenot talks about apocalypse and healing in the latest issue of Tolkien Studies. She draws connections between Tolkien and the shamanic tradition. She says our lack of communication with the forest is a consequence of the Fall.

Here, the break that Eliade identifies between heaven and earth appears also between humankind and “nature”. Communication has been broken off in this relationship also, is indeed impossible, save to a privileged few.

So, are we buying into the idea that Native Americans are prelapsarian? The subject is well represented on line; Google would be happy to provide me with a few thousand documents. I don’t think I’ll read them. Such matters are too subtle for me, and better left to the theologians.  I’m just going to marvel at how I thought I was randomly choosing books and papers from a broad set of interests, and ended up instead with a tightly-coupled network. I’ve included two vertices on the graph without grey circles, to represent influences mentioned by the authors, but which I haven’t read myself.

network of connections

Network of recent reading


Works Cited

Fontenot, Megan N. “The Art of Eternal Disaster: Tolkien’s Apocalypse and the Road to Healing.” Tolkien Studies, vol. 16, 2019, p. 91-109. Project MUSE, doi:10.1353/tks.2019.0008.

Kimmerer, Robin Wall. Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants. United States, Milkweed Editions, 2013.

Powers, Richard. The Overstory: A Novel. United States, W. W. Norton, 2018.

A Voyage in Middle-earth at the BNF

There was no time to get to Oxford for their big Tolkien exhibition in 2018 and I had too much homework to see it when it came to New York, but where will wants not, a way opens, and I was in Paris for the French version, entitled “A Voyage in Middle-earth”. It was the day after Christmas and despite the transport strike, the exhibition hall at the National Library of France was packed. Someone had to come out before the next person could come in. When I came out the exit, a cheer went up from the group waiting to enter. (It’s nice to be appreciated.) People of all ages were there, including both eager adults dragging recalcitrant teenagers and eager children dragging indulgent adults. I’m afraid I may have held up the line several times by stopping to read the Tengwar or the Old English, but I wasn’t the only one. It was fun to notice that Tolkien made spelling mistakes in Tengwar — the difference between creating a language and “just making stuff up” is that spelling mistakes are impossible in the latter.

Most of the exhibit was works by Tolkien or derivative works by Pauline Baynes, the tapestry-weavers of Aubusson, and plenty of others. (I had the Baynes poster on my bedroom wall, and now it’s in a museum. This is what getting old feels like.) There was a generous helping of Gustave Doré: about 10% of the exhibit. It works surprisingly well. For an example, here’s how Doré portrayed the arrival of Gandalf and Erkenbrand to lift the siege of Helm’s Deep.

Under the rubric “contextualization”, the organizers paired many of JRRT’s works with real-world analogues of things mentioned in his texts. I enjoyed seeing these as much as the directly-connected artifacts. They had a palantir, a credible Arkenstone, and they even made an attempt at the Silmarils. Those last were opals from NZ, Australia, and Mexico, illuminated so they glowed.

The fate of vanquished dragonflies

The exhibit had a bronze-age Greek sword that was the right size and shape for Sting. The Horn of Roland was a pretty good match for Boromir’s horn, especially since it has a big split in it. Elves love Art Nouveau, and the jewelers of Maison Fouquet were obviously in touch with the hero of “Errantry”.

Some items were included with only the most tenuous of connections (Charlemagne’s chess set?) but interesting nevertheless. At least there were oliphaunts involved.

The Death Dealer by Frank Frazetta

The more I think about it, the more I like the way they added the contextual objects. When I first read LotR, in the days when fantasy was strange and hard to find, anyone who wanted to know what unfamiliar objects looked like had to hit the encyclopedia. Therefore we found out exactly what JRRT meant by (e.g.) “battle-axe”. Today the supply of images of fantastic weaponry is unlimited. Everybody knows lots of examples of what a battle-axe looks like thanks to fan art, movies, anime, and video games… but 90% of those are not at all what Tolkien was thinking of. The historical battle-axe blade here was about five inches across rather than the 24-36 inches common in fantasy art.  Can you imagine Gimli running from Rauros to Fangorn carrying one of those monsters?

winged helmet

Wings are much more practical than horns.

One item particularly pleasing to this Idiosopher was a winged helmet such as they wore in Gondor. I got some pushback for saying Gondor was like ancient Egypt (lots of people want it to be Byzantine Constantinople), but the Wise Clerks of Paris assure us Minas Tirith’s soldiers were wearing hats from the 4th Century BCE.

Altogether a delightful way to spend a rainy December afternoon. My thanks to all the people who made it happen.


Coda

French Tolkien-nerds are better dressed than their US counterparts, but just as maladroit. We didn’t go three minutes without somebody triggering one of the infrared sensors that beep when you get to close to an artifact (only one was me). An informal scan suggests that less than a quarter of those incidents involved the artifact the person was actually looking at.

Jardin des Plantes

Swung by my old neighborhood today. The botanical gardens are dressed up totally-insane for Christmas. The Jardin des Plantes re-uses the estates of the 18th-Century naturalist le Comte de Buffon, one of my old encyclopedia buddies. It has a big statue of Lamarck, the “creator of the theory of evolution”, featuring a panel where his daughter reassures him that “History will avenge you, father”.[1]

At night this is all lit up, perhaps because the people who designed the exhibits were, too. However, the thing that really made the trip memorable for me was the way the sign out front has been defaced.

I completely understand anyone who loves Paris for the refinement of its cuisine, the elegance of its women, or the creativity of its artists, but for me the glory of the city shall always lie in the fusion of hyper-education and pointless vulgarity exhibited by its graffiti.

(Oh, all right, if you think it will help.)


[1] I have just learned from Wikipedia that Lamarck fought in the Pomeranian War, which must have been the cutest bloodbath in history.

Reading Tolkien with Old English

Hwaet from "Dream of the Rood"This past year I’ve had the experience of hearing The Lord of the Rings with fresh ears, now that I’ve learned Old English.  The first thing that jumps out differently is the names, like seeing “Haleth” in a list, and recognizing a word for “warrior”. At the Council of Elrond we meet Galdor, whose name means a magic charm.

In Rohan, the Old English echoes become louder. Merry is knighted as “Holdwine”, which I now see is a nice double entendre: sure, he can hold his drink, but also hold means “loyal” and wine means “friend”. Here’s another thing I would never have done before: I’ve searched the Old English corpus for historical figures named “holdwine”, just to see if there’s a reference I’m missing. (Can’t find any.)

Treebeard and Legolas like alliterative proverbs. So do I. Perhaps it’s a function of age. Even Gimli gets into the act: “indeed, sooner would I bear a horse than be borne by one.” The first word is modern English that could have been spoken by anyone in the book. After the first two words, though, the sentence turns into a good alliterative line. Now that I’ve read a lot of old English verse, Gimli’s motivation in saying this sounds different. It sounds like he began the sentence in his usual idiom, but when he got two words in he noticed that he could make a witty epigram in the Rohirric style.

That style permeates Book III. Gandalf, making introductions at Meduseld: “And here beside me is Aragorn son of Arathorn, the heir of Kings, and it is to Mundburg that he goes”. On first reading, that sentence sounded weird to a teen-aged idiosopher. Now I get it. Describing a character three different ways in a row is a technique that’s all over Anglo-Saxon poetry. It’s reinforced by the alliteration++ on “Aragorn”, “Arathorn”, and “heir”. (Is there a word for going beyond alliteration, matching the whole first syllable, like a modern English rhyme turned backwards?)

The ancient roots of that sentence go deeper, though. What really struck me when I first read LotR was that weird comma-spliced extra sentence at the end, with the second part just barely related to the first part. English teachers constantly correct their students for doing that. JRRT was an English teacher. What gives? It turns out Anglo-Saxons loved conjunction splices. For example, Anglo-Saxon Chronicle 888: “Queen Æthelswith who was King Alfred’s sister died on the way to Rome, and her body lies at Pavia.

This is the first of several ways Gandalf is being more British than the Queen in this chapter. “It is the will of Théoden King that none should enter his gates, save those who know our tongue and are our friends,” says the guard, so Gandalf lays it on thick.

There was one disappointment. “Éomer” is in Beowulf. Where did Éowyn come from? Her name doesn’t exist in the corpus, but “Þeowen” does. It’s a common variant of “Þeow”. “Handmaiden” is the nicest translation of that word (the others all connote slavery). Not cool! However, that word is part of Queen Wealhþeow‘s name. Maybe there’s a positive meaning we don’t have in the surviving literature. It wouldn’t surprise me if Tolkien inferred an unattested name that must have existed somewhere.

Altogether, this has been a profitable exercise. It’s not easy to have a fresh perspective, the ~50th time one reads a book. When I signed up for Intro to Anglo-Saxon at Signum last winter, the universal reaction of my friends was, “Why?”  Maybe now I know the answer.

What does Grendel sound like?

grendel

By John Henry Frederick Bacon

I’ve been listening to Tom Shippey’s lectures on Beowulf again and reading “The Monsters and the Critics”. Pre-Tolkien scholars seem to have loved finding other things that Grendel could be, besides a monster. They wrote papers proving he was a symbol of malaria, or floods, or the plague, or bears. People in the middle ages loved finding hidden meanings for things that are obvious on the surface. Scholars in the modern era kept it up.  Old habits are hard to break.

I got to wondering, though. This poem was meant to be heard, not studied. What did the name “Grendel” sound like to the people who heard the poem?  I have the entire corpus of Old English literature here on a disk — let’s find out! How would the name resonate with other words in the language?  What other words use those sounds?

Let’s re-use the technique I mentioned earlier with respect to Gollum, except this time we’ll use Old English instead of modern. I constructed a regular expression that has only vowels separating G, R, N, D, and L.  Consonants are much more stable than vowels., so I kept them fixed and let any vowels slide in and around them.  The word has to start with G because alliteration is so important.  We’ll exclude Beowulf and derivative places named for Grendel himself, like “grendles mere” or “grendles bece”, that we sometimes find in land-grant charters. What else do we find?

Grundling

17 mentions, meaning totally, or from the ground up.  Bible stories love this word. A phrase like hi tobræcon þa burh grundlinga “the broke the castle down to the ground”, is a great way to describe just how bad the Israelites had it, back then.

Grundleas

15 mentions, meaning groundless, or bottomless.  Grundleas pytt is a common phrase, too. Tartarus grundleas seað, “Tartarus is a bottomless pit”.

Grindle

Today I learned that “grindle” is still an English word. It means a narrow ditch. Those are useful for marking land grants, too.  There five such mentions.  It also used to mean a herring; I think there’s one use like that.

Conclusion

That’s all I found. The general theme is that Grendel’s name sounds like it belongs underground, in a deep pit. It reminds us of destruction, and of hell.  Even if the poet didn’t call Grendel a devil, this would hold up.  There’s a hint of water there. So it’s entirely possible that the poet didn’t mean Grendel as a symbol of anything — his name sounds like exactly what he is.

This is the same conclusion JRRT reached, which greatly boosts my confidence in its correctness.

Values Added

An online survey today asked me an unexpected question: What are my values?  They gave me a window about the size of a tweet in which to answer.  That was a poser — I’d never thought about so concisely phrasing the things I care about  before.

I came up with a way, and since half the purpose of this blog is to replace my never-good long-term memory, here’s what I said:

Philosophia biou kubernetes. Be excellent to each other. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Some things are none of my business.

It’s entirely within my idiom to do this after bumper-stickers have gone out of style.

It is simply court etiquette

Lee Smith has conducted a thorough dissection of the TSA screening procedures in Rohan. (LOL) My response got too long for the text box, so I’m posting it here.

Yesterday I was listening to Tom Shippey’s lecture on “face-threatening acts” in the Signum University course Beowulf through Tolkien and vice versa. Now I have a completely different perspective on what Aragorn & the gang are doing.

Anglo-Saxon weapons not permittedProf. Shippey is building on the sociologists’ theory of politeness as it would apply to a society “where everyone is heavily armed and more than a little bit touchy.”  (The accuracy of this quote is not guaranteed because he was also talking about living in Texas and I was laughing too hard for scholarly exactitude.) The objective is to establish that you’re a member of the élite, a fighter, but one who’s not fighting anyone right now.

Shippey says that in old-germanic warrior cultures, proper etiquette upon meeting someone new is to make a threatening macho gesture to establish that you belong to the dominant warrior class, but then immediately soften it with a conciliatory compliment. Then the other party does the same, and then you can get down to business.  The coast guard does this in lines 244-251 of Beowulf. In Heorot Hrothgar does the same thing from his higher status, and then everyone congratulates Beowulf on how well-spoken he is. From this point of view, the threats and boasts in Heorot are as distinct a form of courtly speech as a seduction in “Dangerous Liaisons”.

As so many scholars have noted, Háma the door-ward is basically the same role as the coast guard in Beowulf. Middle-earth is a bit more complicated, though. We have a much more diverse environment to deal with. First off, those who are neither human nor pretending to be don’t have to play the game. Legolas immediately sets down his weapons with, as Lee says, a comment that he knows Háma will take as a safety warning. (Am I wrong to infer a quiet laugh at the odd rituals of  “you children”? Possibly.)  Gimli just waits for the contest to be over, and then makes an ironic joke. (His axe has no more symbolism or prestige than my chainsaw.)

Now, the ones who can speak Rohirric. Aragorn has to be a jerk here (by our standards) because not only does he out-rank the door-ward, he outranks Théoden. Therefore he has to come up with a speech that’s even stronger than what the others are saying. So he satisfies the code of etiquette, but tops it off with a curse. I agree with Lee that he’s bluffing.

Gandalf does things in the reverse order to twist the system to his own advantage. He happily hands over Glamdring, showing submission. Then he commits a face-threatening act over his staff, which Wormtongue has specifically forbidden. Háma doesn’t like this, but he also doesn’t want to fight with Gandalf because he doesn’t agree with the cause. (And maybe suspects it will go badly for him.) Aragorn puts his thumb on the scale by asserting that Gandalf isn’t actually one of the warrior élite, “giving him top cover” as we say in Washington. But the balance is finally tipped when Háma thinks of an old proverb relevant to the situation. As Prof. Shippey said later in the lecture, proverbs are a great way to disclaim responsibility. And all’s well as ends better!

Perhaps you suppose this throng
Can’t keep it up all day long.
If that’s your idea, you’re wrong!
-W.S. Gilbert

Christmas in Middle-earth

Overheard in the Idiosopher’s house…

Mrs: I think we should celebrate Christmas with my family in France.
Me: Hurrah!
Mrs: … but, I’m going to need a day that’s just for doing sister-stuff. Will you be OK by yourself if I ditch you for that one?
National Library of France:

Me: I ought to be able to handle it.

Modern English subjunctives

In Old English class last winter, the teacher introduced the subjunctive mood by saying, “We don’t have it in modern English, but …” Well, I still use the subjunctive. I’ve noticed that the BBC doesn’t use it much any more, but here in the States it’s not gone. Since then, I’ve been keeping track. Here are subjunctives I’ve collected in six months:

  • that an Internet image search for “subjunctive” is deeply disappointing?

    I wouldn’t do that if I were you

  • Be that as it may
  • God save the Queen
  • Let there be light
  • The powers that be
  • Let the chips fall where they may
  • Whisper words of wisdom, let it be…
Musical Interlude

Defying the BBC ban, this song by Eric Clapton points out that the subjunctive in modern English can be indicated by word order, too. I like the way we’ve adopted a good old-English modal-infinitive structure to convey a Continental verb mood, using “let” or “may” to change the mood to subjunctive.

Poetry Corner

A double dactyl by George Starbuck where the subjunctive forms the rhyme:

SAID
Dame Edith Evans to
Margaret Rutherford,
“Seance? Oh really, my
Dear, if there be
Nonhypothetical
Extraterrestrial
Parapsychologists,
THEY can call ME.”

Page 11 of 31

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén